Being raised in the South means eventually realizing your childhood teacher may be a MAGA-minded science-denier

I’m the proud “alum” of Grovetown Elementary School – home of the Chickenhawks. Why we had a mascot, I’ll never understand; we had no athletic program with varsity or junior varsity teams, nor were we even a feeder school for a middle or high school with a Rooster/Gamecock mascot, but I digress.

Being a “graduate” of that little school from the 1980s meant a profound appreciation – admiration even – for the towering principal, Wayne Hardy, with his booming baritone voice and even-keeled temperament. It means, for most of us, anyway, we survived classes with the tough-as-nails, cynically wry Ellen Lewis.

He’s just “Wayne” to me now; she’s just “Ellen.” I know it’s maybe more polite to still refer to them as “Mr. Hardy” and “Mrs. Lewis,” but they refer to me on social media by my first name, and when we get into any sort of heated political dialogue, I prefer evening the playing field.

You see both are Trump enthusiasts, and that’s fine; I, of course, am not.

What’s alarming to me, though, is how shockingly deluded both have shown themselves to be; it’s hard, after all, to be cognizant of data, facts, math and science while still being a Trump enthusiast. It just is. Wayne’s become less combative since the election, and he and are Facebook “friends” and show mutual respect with each other more often than not. Ellen Lewis and I, though, aren’t connected on social media, and it’s likely for the. best. You’ll see why shortly.

My sister – also a Trump enthusiast – Friday, offered on Facebook the following summation:

“The “President Elect” announced once he is inaugurated, he is going to ask everyone to wear mask for just 100 days and then stated it’s just 100 days!!! Where has he been the past 9 months?!?!? Oh yeah, he may not remember what all has transpired the past 9 months!!!

Bless it! What a shame!”

Of course I responded with stark reality.

Then came my former sixth grade science teacher, Ellen Lewis.

“Is this the week that masks are important and work? Perhaps, it’s next week that they are important to wear. It’s so hard to keep up with which side is in vogue at any given point in time. I don’t think that the paper masks that folks are wearing do anything at all. The virus is smaller than the weave of the fiber, “according to the latest experts”. Can you run the stats on the deaths without masks in comparison to how many die because the vaccine manufacturers have only quoted 90% and 95% effective? Floppy Joe is welcome to ask, but he cannot require.”

That’s right; my sixth grade SCIENCE teacher is a mask-denying cynic. I’m hastily copying and pasting the rest of this mentally jarring conversation – with my SIXTH GRADE SCIENCE TEACHER – so that I’m not alone in my concern for what our colleges and universities are (or at least were) offering our pubic schools with teaching degrees in-hand.

ME: Ellen you were a science teacher once so I’ll give you a scientific study done to show that masks do indeed have an impact. Of course the paper masks aren’t 100% effective. Condoms aren’t either. But wear one around someone else wearing one and y’all try to spit on one another and tell me who wets each other’s chins first. Try to blow out a candle with one. They’re better than nothing. (Kansas University study: Do Masks Matter in Kansas?

EL: The last study I saw at the beginning of the week, said that masks don’t really work. No one has a true handle on Covid- 19, but I am a cynic and see nothing but politics and control in this anyway. Although there could be someone I’d think about spitting “at”, I don’t plan on experimenting with it. I do know that when I did try a mask, it fogged my glasses, chapped my lips, and kept me breathless, since I couldn’t breathe wearing it. I have rotten sinus congestion. That was the end of the mask for me. Hmmm, blow a candle out? I’d probably set the paper mask on fire, if I tried that. Lovely graphics in the study, but I don’t think we will engage in “dueling” studies, but I will leave you with something from a professor I had. When I was taking at statistics course to complete the Phd, I had a great professor who gave the class a caveat on the first day of the semester. He said to always keep in mind that we can prove anything we want, take any position, and use the same data to reach opposite sides of a question. I can tell you that his comment certainly shocked my anal retentive, black and white twist on proving everything.

ME: Ellen oh trust me, I’m well aware folks can make studies say whatever they want, but I highly doubt Kansas University has a dog in the fight. Nor does the CDC or NIH or WHO. I hate wearing masks too. They doc my glasses up and remind me what I had for lunch way more than I’d like to admit; but I also hate that we’re on pace to hit 300,000 dead Americans before the end of 2020 and with two senior in-laws and a father with congenital heart failure (who says his doctor told him under no uncertain terms Covid WOULD kill him), it’s a small sacrifice to deal with.

EL: Ron, the CDE and NIH are both run by career Democrats, Redfield and Fauci. No dog in the hunt? They are in it up to their hairlines. WHO is in bed with the Chinese who were instrumental in getting Tedrous, the “person they wanted” to head the agency. Did I mention I am a cynic? I don’t have info about KU, but am willing to make a side bet on where their loyalties are. I understand the fragility of the elderly and those with at-risk side problems. I have four all on my own, but those who are in danger, should take precautions. Once we took the overload off the hospitals we should have opened back up and not destroyed the economy. Did the experts really think that Covid was going to take a trip in outer space and not be ready to infect people? Of course the numbers would go up. If we want to face this same problem forever, we have to establish herd immunity and/or have the vaccine, but hiding in the basement or other places doesn’t do that. It should have been allowed to run its course as long as we could handle those with severe needs. I’m a “glass full” kind of person and prefer to think of how many have it and survive. I’ve been keeping the death count and with my last update, we hadn’t even reached 1% of the population. I’ll do an update, but in my last count Covid was #3 on the list of deaths by the disease, beaten out by Heart problems and cancer.

ME: “scientists” and university scholars DO tend to be more liberal because science, data, facts and logic tend to have a liberal bias. Fauci has served for GOP and Democrat presidents. Never a complaint about him until BLOTUS came ambling into office with his paid-for college test scores and whatnot. If you’re a cynic, where pray tell is your cynicism for the greatest human fraud to occupy the highest office in our land? Our hospitals ARE overloaded again WITH our economy largely having been reopened most of the summer and fall, and had we done a better job not just plateauing our curve but instead flattening it, maybe we’d not be in the position we are now, where states are having to again shut down for human survival. ARTICLE:  Sweden tried “herd immunity.” It was a failure.)

EL: You mean Obama, right? I saw that he was recently named the worst US president and they won’t get an argument out of me. Fauci was an active member and supporter of the Clinton Foundation and is a Democrat and best buddy of Hillary. It’s sort of like working to hold onto your bureaucratic job to keep the money coming in, you’ll work with anyone. My illogical dislike of him crew by leaps and bounds until he finally showed his desire for power is his main objective. A friend of mine was part of an MCG study and was infected with Covid. His doctor firmly believes in herd immunity and my own physician does too. The greatest hoax on the US will be a toss up between the Obama presidency and the scare tactics of Covid-19. I am looking for my data and will share with you as soon as I find it.

ME: Fauci has served in his current capacity since 1984. That’s St. Reagan the Infallible and two Bush administrations. I’m sure whatever right wing swill you aren’t cynical of would grade Obama so poorly but once again facts and data say the man who followed him was far worse. And this article – from pro-business usually very right wing Forbes – doesn’t even ACCOUNT for Covid. SOURCE: TRUMP’S ECONOMIC GROWTH IS SLOWER THAN OBAMA’S LAST 3 YEARS

EL: Did Obama have a Pandemic? Oh, no, he had the weakest recovery in history without a Pandemic Longevity doesn’t mean much in DC other than Fauci knows how to suck up to his bosses. He’s an arrogant twit for whom I lost respect months ago.

ME: Ellen, yes. Yes Obama did. Ebola, SARS, swine flu and zika and he let science take the lead. In fact, he learned from them and created the pandemic response team Trump’s chief of staff, John Bolton, dispersed months before the current Covid outbreak. Good call.

EL: I don’t drink swill, but I watch liberals gulp it down on a regular basis. I didn’t conduct the poll that graded Obama, so I won’t argue the point. I think his warts are showing up. The man who followed him improved the economy twice, save lives with his quick action in closing the border for some, under his leadership a vaccine is being developed faster than any in history for such a devastating disease, so comparing apples and oranges still doesn’t work. If you’ll remember Steve had two failed attempts in his bid for the White House, so I’ll sprinkle a little salt on that “dish”.

ME: Let’s also not forget the rampant and record and willful GOP obstructionism and sabotage of economic progress when Obama was President. Record (ab)use of the filibuster. The feigning of pearl-clutching outrage over the debt ceiling that cost the country a credit downgrade. Funny that debt ceiling stuff hasn’t been much of a concern under Donaldus the dimwit. Raised twice. Suspended twice. BET the deficit suddenly becomes an issue to feckless Republicans again after he’s removed from office. Watch. So share this “Obama worst” citation. You were among the early educators who stressed using citations. Trump coasted on the economy he inherited and every economic measure shows it slowed on his watch BEFORE Covid. I’ve already provided citation that bears that out instead of just saying it. That border closure likely exacerbated the issue, rushing ex-pats to airports before the European travel ban locked the country down without a quarantine or screening process in place here. More than 40,000 folks still traveled here from China after mango Mensa man’s Chinese ban. The vaccines? Pfizer is a German country. Their vaccine has no federal assistance attached to it outside of Germany’s.

EL: OK, if you want to include N1H1 that Obama gave to Biden to manage and then told Klaine that they had to clean up Biden’s mess when he screwed it up so badly, I’ll concede that fact. Klaine actually admitted that the only reason they survived N1H1 was pure dumb luck. If you’re going to accept the low bar and compare it to a Pandemic, go for it, but it’s hardly even a decent comparison. Not only did Biden screw up his job, he never replenished the equipment and supplies and left the cupboard bare. That’s why President Trump had to bring corporate America in to manufacture equipment on an emergency basis. Yep, Obama and Biden are quite a match. Obama did his best to cause divisiveness and Biden just had to be Biden to bring down the house on our heads.

*** She then shared a 2014 poll (conveniently before Trump was president) from Quinnipiac University where Obama did, in fact, poll at the top of “worst presidents since World War II,” although he also finished 4th best in the same poll. She didn’t use the most recent poll, though. In 2018, it was Donald Trump, with a whopping 41% of respondents choosing him as “worst.” Obama was second, but down from 33% to 21% in the four-year span. **

EL: Trump was the first to lock down and little Joe kept saying that made Trump a racist. Don’t you remember that? Ron, Ron, Ron, how can you disparage Trump calling names when you do it yourself?

ME: Ellen, you set the tone: “Floppy Joe.” Also, context matters. ““What I was trying to say was that if one relies only on vaccines as your major strategy, and vaccines are late then you are screwed, and really bad things can happen,” Klain added. “Of course H1N1 was beaten without much use of the vaccine. Of course, you could argue that what Trump has been doing the past few months — downplaying testing, downplaying masks, downplaying tracing and other public health measures, while promising a cure/vaccine is ‘just around the corner’ — proves my point: The U.S. death rate from covid post-June is unmatched in the world.” SOURCE: WASHINGTON POST

I remember the “racist” claim being fact-checked, too. SOURCE: POLITIFACT.

EL: So you use the Washington Post and Bezos. Uh huh.

ME: I use citations, period. Trump IS a racist. The REPUBLICAN Nixon administration sounded that alarm before I was even born. Nothing new there.

EL: Sure, if he’s such a racist, why does he have so many black friends and why has he done more for black and Hispanic citizens. I’m inclined to believe a black man’s assessment. ARTICLE: HERSCHEL WALKER: DONALD TRUMP IS NOT A RACIST

And the Nixon administration suffered the resignation of Nixon and multiple aides. Now there is a credible group, NOT

ME: oh my. You bristle at WaPo what with its long line of Pulitzer and Peabodys and hit me with …CNS NEWS? 😂“Overall, we rate CNS News Questionable based on extreme right-wing bias, promotion of propaganda, and numerous failed fact checks.” SOURCE: MEDIA BIAS FACT CHECK

EL: Awe, did St. Obama get some backlash? He got away with murder compared to what the mentally deficient liberals did to him.

ME: Find the flaw in the DOJ slapping Trump with his racist housing policies then. I’ll wait. SOURCE: ‘NO VACANCY’ FOR BLACKS: HOW DONALD TRUMP GOT HIS START, AND WAS FIRST ACCUSED OF BIAS

EL: So, you don’t accept that he has done more for blacks regardless of whatever he’s accused of in the past. That would be like you being held accountable for poopy diapers. Come on…

ME: Heck no. Black unemployment was ALREADY in steep decline prior to his inauguration. No credit for that. The ONE thing he gets credit for is signing the FIRST STEP Act. That act has roots that go back well before he was in office though and he A. didn’t write the bill nor B. make it a policy platform. He signed what was sent to his desk. Good for him. A broke clock is right 2x a day. He wasn’t an infant in the early 1970s. A grown adult. Son of a racist father.

He DID manage to continue funding HBCUs but then chose to lie about “saving them” when in fact …• HBCUs received funding under the same program during President Barack Obama’s time in the White House. It’s a stretch to say Trump “saved” them.• Two experts calculated the total federal funding provided to HBCUs for PolitiFact. Those numbers show little change between the Obama years and the first year under Trump.” SOURCE: POLITIFACT

EL: I had you pegged for not being conned, but I guess I was incorrect. The nut doesn’t fall far from the tree and considering how well he gets along with other races, he’s done pretty well. I will tell you that at the beginning, I was not a Trump fan and I blamed the ego-ridden field of candidates for not forming and choosing among them, but let Trump win with 36%. That isn’t as bad as Harris’s 2% and no money, but Trump survived and got into the White House. As I watched his efforts and realized that low rent people were working to destroy him and get him out of office, even though he was doing a decent job, I realized that there was no hope for the party of Hatred and Animosity. You hold up fairly well, and don’t slip into the liberal formula, but think more than your brethren who use the formula of “you lie, cursing, and going off the charts”. Bravo on that. I have already offered to help the Trump 2024 campaign, so I guess we’ll see if there is anything left of America in four years. Floppy Joe has already threatened my savings and now that I’m retired I can’t afford a government thief taking my retirement funds. Joe’s sexual proclivities not withstanding, I do not expect him to complete his term in office. They will either force him out or kill him. We have a pool and I drew 6 months, so we’ll see on that one as well. Take care, I have much to do before I get to bed.

NOTE: She edited (and added to that comment; I missed most of it, but find much of it not worth even responding to.

ME: I back up what I say with attributions. You gave me … CNS News. Some self-awareness, ma’am. I can’t believe I’m having a discussion about critical thinking with my 6th grade science teacher and a former assistant principal from my high school whose choices of sources include a right wing website and little else by way of citations.YOU taught me and hundred, if not thousands of other students, better.

EL: Oh Ron, you tripped and stumbled. I reply in kind. You give me liberal sub-par citations and I don’t feel obliged to give you anything that you think is the only answer that is correct, that with which you agree from a site that is obviously biased. You are giving me liberal talking points, so I reply in kind. You cite the New York Times (gag), the Washington Post <eyeroll>, thewrap. com <entertainment business <cough>, Politifact. com <close, but no cigar>, Mediabias fact check <one guy’s opinion that has no scientific basis> really? If you really want to spar, you’ll have to give me something to aim at. I heard Herschell and know that the source was correct and actually, I will use a source, if I know it’s right, based on my own experience and what I’ve heard from the person myself. Yes, I watched the conventions although I had to have some help with the DNC. So many lies, so little time. You back something up with liberally biased material, I’ll return in kind. So, before you criticize my sources, perhaps you should look at your own. I taught you better, and I know you can do better. I am not trying to convert you in any way, just trying to take the emotional earmark off your comments.

ME: Ellen, you’re the one who’s clearly “slipped” • “that with which you agree from a site that is obviously biased.” she says while providing just a CNS “News” clip purporting that Donald can’t possibly be racist because a football player he gave millions to to skip his senior season of college said he’s not. Bravo. Great resource. You conservatives crack me up how you believe the 0.3% of African Americans say but tell us the other 99.7% is nonsense. But nope; the “southern strategy” of the GOP had nooooo effect on your thinking at all. You’re aware of the “southern strategy,” yes? I ask because it wasn’t mentioned in public school history or government courses. Nor was the post-Civil War “Lost Cause” spin mentioned either. • You bristle at sources that are largely center of the ideological spectrum, which is understandably “liberal” to radical right wing MAGAs.

ME: Note where CNS News is. Oh and incidentally, the most RECENT Quinnipiac poll that asked “who’s the worst president since World War II” was done in 2018. Donald Trump “won” that “honor” with a WHOPPING 41% of respondents. Hey, he beat Obama at something finally! LOL SOURCE: Quinnipiac poll: 41% say Trump worst president since World War II

# # #

That’s how the conversation went; me with my citations (SHE TAUGHT ME THAT!) and sources. Her with … Herschel Walker via CNS News. My sixth great teacher, y’all.

Robert Reich Eviscerates Donald’s “Trumped Up” Myths on Immigration

ReichFormer Clinton administration Labor Secretary Robert Reich wasted little time eviscerating Donald Trump’s proposed immigration policy, taking to Facebook to scribe this:

Donald Trump has opened the floodgates to lies about immigration. Here are 4 trumped-up myths along with the facts.

1. MYTH: Immigrants commit lots of crime. FACT: Immigrants don’t commit much crime. Incarceration rates among young men are lowest for immigrants, especially for the Mexicans, Salvadorans, and Guatemalans who make up the bulk of the undocumented population, according to the Justice Department.

2. MYTH: The number of undocumented immigrants in the U.S. is soaring. FACT: The number of undocumented immigrants living in the U.S. has declined from 12.2 million in 2007 to 11.3 million now, according to Pew Research Center. Which means the net rate of illegal immigration into the U.S. is less than zero.

3. MYTH: Most new immigrants are from Mexico. FACT: More people now immigrate into the U.S. from China and India than from Mexico, according to the Bureau of Immigration. The Latin American immigration boom is ending, and the Asian immigration boom is just beginning.

4. MYTH: The U.S. can’t afford more immigrants. FACT: We can’t afford not to have more immigrants because the U.S. population is aging. Twenty-five years ago, each retiree in America was matched by 5 workers. Now for each retiree there are only 3 workers. Without more immigration, in 15 years the ratio will fall to 2 workers for every retiree, not nearly enough to sustain our retiree population.

Demagogues grow on lies. Spread the truth.

The confederate flag is coming down; so now what?

The soon-to-be removed confederate battle flag at the South Carolina Statehouse.

The soon-to-be removed confederate battle flag at the South Carolina Statehouse.

Earlier today, South Carolina governor Nikki Haley signed into law a bill, passed by both the state’s Senate and House chambers, that will remove the confederate battle flag from the pole adjacent to a confederate war memorial on the capitol grounds.  This stunning, whirlwind accomplishment caps an emotional 22 days here in South Carolina.  Let’s review:

When running for re-election just last year, governor Haley dismissed ANY notion that the presence of said flag caused any negative views of her state from outside investors.  Her opponent, state senator Vincent Sheheen, had advocated for its removal, but hey, he lost, so the issue, we believed, was dead as of last November.

(CNN.com) Governor Nikky Haley, speaking in Charleston, the morning after the AME church killings.

Governor Nikky Haley, speaking in Charleston, the morning after the AME church killings.

The stunning slaughter of nine Charleston church-goers in the Emanuel AME Church, during bible study, set the course for a whiplash-inducing change of position – not just in Haley’s mind, but in the minds of dozens of state G.O.P. lawmakers.  Democrats, by and large, were long ready to see the final moments of the flag on state grounds, but you could hear it in Haley’s voice when she made her remarks the morning after Dylan Roof senselessly massacred those nine innocents.  Something had triggered immense compassion within her; maybe it was her own minority upbringing and lineage, or perhaps she, being a devout Christian convert, that doctrine finally triggered something in her mind.  It’s easier to speculate what made Haley change her position, I suppose, but let’s instead just enjoy it.

What Haley and her Republican compatriots have learned, however, is the voting bloc they’ve long pandered to can and will turn on them in a SECOND.  The very people that rallied to the ballot box to re-elect the governor and seat so many in the G.O.P.-heavy statehouse certainly didn’t vote for THIS, and if the comments on her Facebook page are of ANY indication, they’re seething with rage.

What will be interesting, though, is to see what, if any, repercussions she and other state Republican lawmakers face in future election cycles.  Will there be pro-confederate conservative candidates for them to take on?  Haley’s immune from reprisal, at least in South Carolina.  Her second (and final) term is up in 2018, but will this stunt or catapult her into a national spotlight?  Does she even care?

The Haley I’ve seen since that tear-inducing next-day statement isn’t at ALL the Nikki Haley progressives have come to loathe.   There’s no way to describe this change in tenor, but it’s real and it’s pronounced.

So now what?

For the pro-confederates, there’s this as consolation: it’s not as if this is the first time that flag’s come down, and I’m not just talking about Bree Newsome’s heroic activism nearly two weeks ago.  No, that flag’s HAD to have been brought down before; of this I’m confident.

How so, you ask?

Well, I find myself having to replace my garden flags annually because the sun fades them out.  You can’t tell me any flag that was put up in 1961, re-affirmed by a segregation-entrenched legislature in 1962, then moved from atop the statehouse dome to its current place on the building’s grounds in 2000 is still that colorful.

Kirby Smith, surrendering

Kirby Smith, surrendering

No, any flag up that long, under so many intense South Carolina summers, would more resemble the last and MOST historically relevant flag pertaining the confederacy …

… the bleached-white flag of surrender.

If Democrats Want To Win Midterms, They Need Candidates Who Are … DEMOCRATS

140226-F-XH297-660As I sit here somewhat (but not really) surprised that the Associated Press has projected Nikki Haley will win a second term in the South Carolina governor’s office, I’m starting to feel my blood boil just a little.  Let’s see … between the

* Department of Revenue identity faux pas, exposing the identities MILLIONS of South Carolinians to fraud

* poor handling of child abuse (and death!!!) and neglect under state DSS supervision

* essentially TREASONOUS refusal to recognize a federal court ruling trumping the state’s constitution with something called the “U.S. Constitution..”

* FALSE and inflated promise of jobs (Amazon.com, Startek are a couple that come to mind) DESPITE Haley and the state giving them a TON in tax breaks that the state’s coffers will now never see and will likely benefit far less than anticipated because of those “job creators’ ” falling sort of promise …

* Haley’s “pay for play” campaign donation scandal benefiting a governor who ran on a “political reform” platform, no less…

* Her governing over a state with one of the highest percentage of uninsured citizens, yet she refused to accept FREE Medicaid expansion dollars (that are just going to other states now)

You’ll have to explain her re-election to me, ’cause a paper bag puppet should’ve blown the doors off of her.  Actually, this result isn’t as surprising as I make it out to be, for two glaring reasons:

1. She had an (R) by her name and that’s “enough” for far too many pre-programmed Southerners.

2. Sheheen ran more like a Republican than the independent Republican (Tom Irvin) did, and that likely failed to electrify enough of the base to make him a serious challenger, particularly without a Presidential race also on the ticket.  He had his chance, but passed on marriage equality.  Do the math: if 10% of the state’s 4.6 million residents are gay, that’s 460,000 South Carolinians who, you’d think would have just cause to rally to his support.  If only half of them are registered voters and half of THEM showed up, that’s over 115,000 votes; likely more than enough to carry Sheheen to victory.

The bottom line is this: Haley wasn’t even popular with REPUBLICANS in this state, and yet Vincent Sheheen couldn’t take advantage of that.  And I’m sorry, but he has no one to blame but himself for that shortcoming.

The same story is unfolding all across the country … in Kentucky, Mitch McConnell has to PAY people to be his friends at rallies, and yet he’s re-elected to the U.S. freaking Senate!!!  He’s one of the 101 most powerful people in the NATION, and he has to pay people to show up to his rallies.  Let that sink in.  A Democratic challenger, Alison Lundergan Grimes, frankly BLEW it when she couldn’t show she had the stones to say “yes, I voted for Barack Obama, the leader of my party, when he ran for re-election in 2012.”  Why’s that a condemnation?  And who does she think she’s fooling by not divulging that near-certain fact?

Why would a “staunch” Democrat in Kentucky WANT to vote for her?  I mean, OTHER than “she’s not Mitch McConnell.”  News flash: Democrat voters ARE proud to BE Democrats, and tend to back folks who ARE unabashed Democrats, too.  Wooing the “Clinton Republican” that hardly exists?  Foolish.  And costly, as we’re learning tonight.

If you’re gonna run as a Democrat, and barrage Democrats’ inboxes with pleas for money, and seek Democratic party support and campaign funding …

… BE a freaking Democrat.  Or find or create a party that best suits what you are: an opportunist looking for a spotlight and a title.

Government Regulations: “People Protectors,” not “Job Killers”

Reichprofile(from Robert Reich via Facebook) Every speaker at C-PAC, the conservative rage-a-thon, has condemned government regulations as “job killers.” Wrong. They’re people protecters. Most Americans remember how deregulation of Wall Street led to 2008’s near meltdown, inadequate regulation of off-shore drilling resulted in BP’s blowout, and, more recently, how a leaky storage tank of toxic chemicals made Charleston’s groundwater undrinkable, and GM’s unwillingness to fix faulty ignitions are linked to at least 13 deaths. The fact is, because corporations are under ever-greater pressure to show fat profits, any workers, consumers, small investors or innocent bystanders who stand in the way are endangered unless regulations protect them.

But regulations are worthless if inadequately enforced (Republicans have been slashing the budgets of enforcement agencies) and if penalties for violating them aren’t high enough (rule of thumb: The size of the penalty multiplied by the probability of getting caught must be higher than the profits to be made by skirting the regulation). Regulations can even spur job growth if they push companies to innovate in order to meet their goals (California’s fuel-economy standards, for example, have spawned a new generation of automobiles, along with new jobs).

Conservatives Try (and Fail) To Tie Ukraine to Keystone XL Pipeline

From former Secretary of Labor Robert Reich (via Facebook)

ReichprofileConservatives never let a foreign-policy crisis go to waste. Consider today’s right-wing talking points linking the crisis in Ukraine to approval of the Keystone XL pipeline. Paul Ryan says approval of the pipeline would “signal America is open for energy business and America will be helping our allies with energy resources so that they can be less dependent on Russian energy resources.” Fox News’ Bill O’Reilly says “the Keystone pipeline must be approved. Why? Because Russia is blackmailing Europe over energy … the more oil and natural gas the USA and Canada can produce and distribute, the weaker Russia becomes on the world stage.”

This is pure baloney for at least three reasons: (1) Even if approved, construction of the pipeline would take at least a year — hardly a timely response to the crisis in Ukraine, (2) even at full capacity, oil from Canada’s tar sands would deliver 830,000 barrels per day, barely a trickle in a global oil market that consumes 92 million barrels a day — and therefore would have almost no impact on Russia’s oil sales, and (3) Russia’s real bargaining strength comes in its supplies of natural gas to Europe, but natural gas is difficult and costly to transfer and store in cargo ships bound to Europe from American ports.

Atlanta’s Gridlock and Conservatives’ “About Face” On Assessing Blame

Being that i was raised in Georgia, spent a few years living in and/or near Atlanta, and also just so happened to live in Louisiana through three hurricanes – including the now-infamous Katrina – I feel as if I have a unique perspective with which to share.

In 2005, Louisiana (and national) conservative “Friday Morning Quarterbacks” couldn’t resist putting their post-Katrina blame assessment on Governor Kathleen Babineaux Blanco – the lone southern governor who also happened to be a Democrat.  Never mind that her having to work with a buffoon for a New Orleans mayor, and a buffoon of a U.S. President who’d appointed a buffoon to head the Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA), who she also had to deal with; no, all of the failings of the government response to Louisiana’s deadliest storm in decades fell on Democrat governor Kathleen Blanco.

Now, while I’d be glad to re-visit how Blanco was wrongly blamed for a multitude of shortcomings that she had little-to-nothing to do with, let’s instead focus on the recent gridlock on the streets and highways of the greater metropolitan Atlanta, Georgia area.

courtesy PzFeed@twitter.com

courtesy PzFeed@twitter.com

Local and national meteorologists, including those from the National Weather Service (by whom Governor Nathan Deal  is informed of pressing weather matters that affect his state) were eyeing “Winter Storm Leon” and it’s potential impacts on many southern states unaccustomed to winter storms.  However, in the aftermath of a colossal traffic jam yesterday, Governor Deal said the storm was “unexpected.”

Seriously?

From the Weather Channel:

“We have been confronted with an unexpected winter storm that has hit the metropolitan Atlanta area,” the governor said.

But a timeline of winter storm watches, warnings, and advisories paints a different picture, one that shows that the governor and other government officials had nearly a day to prepare for significant impacts from Winter Storm Leon.

“The entire metro Atlanta area was under a winter storm watch early Monday morning, giving plenty of time to prepare for a worst-case scenario,” said weather.com meteorologist Chris Dolce. “By late Monday afternoon and evening, confidence increased that significant snow would impact Atlanta and winter storm warnings (south metro) and winter weather advisories (north metro) were issued.”

Despite Monday’s warnings and advisories, the governor said that as of Tuesday at 10 a.m. “it was still in most of the forecasts anticipated that the city of Atlanta would only have a mild dusting or a very small accumulation, if any. And that the majority of the effects of the storm would be south of here. Preparations were made for those predictions.”

Yet, at 3:38 a.m. Tuesday, more than 6 hours before governor Deal’s timeline, the National Weather Service issued a winter storm warning, indicating an even higher level of potential impact from Winter Storm Leon .

“Confidence increased more by early Tuesday morning that significant snow would affect Atlanta and winter storm warnings were posted for the entire metro area at 3:38 a.m,” Dolce said.

Still, in the face of numerous watches, warnings, and advisories over a three day span, Gov. Deal felt unprepared.

“There are certain things we don’t have control over and one of those is the weather. This came rather unexpectedly. The time frame in which it hit was a very short time frame.”

Except, as the Weather Channel’s time frame (here) points out, there was ample warning and time for the state to step into action.

Earlier today, I found myself engaging in a back-and-forth with a Charleston, SC-area conservative radio host – Bryan Crabtree.  Crabtree believes local school boards and Atlanta mayor Kasim Reed are as much to blame as the governor.  Here’s the problem with that defense/deflection: only the governor actually governs over the entire metropolitan Atlanta area.  Atlanta (population 450,000) is the central city of the metro area (population 5.5 million).  Reed is literally mayor of less than 10% of the area’s residents.  The school systems?  Well, there’s the city of Atlanta, Fulton, Dekalb, and you have to throw in Cobb county, as well, since the southern-most portion of that county is served by the Interstate 285 loop.

And all of them would’ve been under orders to cancel school or to send students home – even in a staggered schedule – from only one desk; that of Governor Nathan Deal.

Now, New Orleanians probably know what “contra-flow” is, but for the rest of you who don’t – imagine an interstate highway where both sides go in the same direction.  That’s what contra-flow is, and it’s VERY effective at helping to evacuate large numbers of people/vehicles.  Because of the Atlanta area’s expansive interstate highway grid, such an endeavor could only have been ordered from one desk; that of Governor Nathan Deal.

Put those two orders in motion and yesterday’s calamity in the streets of metro Atlanta would have never been as severe as they wound up being.

So the question is, where are all those right-wing “Friday Morning Quarterbacks,” when a governor shows no leadership in the eye of a storm?

P.S. Do I NEED to mention that Atlanta has more interstate highway miles, per square inch, than any other metropolitan area in the country?  And that it’s mass rail transit system – MARTA – is given little chance to expand when expansion is constantly and persistently voted down and demonized by suburban politicians?

We’ve Lost Sight In What These Holidays Are Meant To Be About

Ethan and I were talking over dinner and I probably wasn’t doing a very good job conveying what was on my mind, but I think I’ve decided that when we have kids, I want us to try and minimize the over-saturation of the marketing monster this time of year has become.

This is LITERALLY the first photo Google displays when you type in "Black Friday" for an image search.

(courtesy: technobuffalo.com) This is LITERALLY the first photo Google displays when you image search “Black Friday.”

Face it; we’re sheep.  We’re made to believe we HAVE to camp out on holidays meant for spending time with loved ones so we can buy another flat screen or “PS this or XBox that” at a CRAZY price (if there are enough quantities when we finally get inside).  We’re inundated with marketing campaigns that program not only us but our kids what the “must-have” items are each year, instead of deciding for ourselves what WE want or need.

I mean, how many GROWN-UPS fall for the “get her some pricey jewelry” or “tie the big bow around a $40,000+ sedan and park it in the driveway” gimmick?  Too many.

Hey, don’t get me wrong; the lights, the songs, some presents … all nice.  And I don’t have a religious bone in my body, but I sure wish the “war on Christmas” idiots would turn their attention to what’s REALLY “attacking” Christmas.  Macy’s.  Toys ‘R Us.  Walmart.  Lexus?

Personally, I’d rather we rewarded our kid(s) with bicycles and Playstations after an “all-A’s” report card, and instead got a few odds and ends at Christmas time.  Or after doing something selfless and having not been goaded to.

Today, I enjoyed some time out of the office to participate in the local Sertoma Club Christmas charity event; a few dozen volunteers were matched with some of the area’s poorest kids, given a budget and some info about the child, and tasked with helping them pick out some new clothes, shoes and a toy or two, as well.

My 8-year old partner was a blast to shop with: cute as a button and as sweet as could be. She was also (thankfully) pretty decisive about the clothing and shoes she liked (I, uncharacteristically have no skill with girls’ clothing).

What I enjoy most about participating in this function… these little ones give a “re-charge” to my faith in humanity’s future. The kids are wonderful; with all they could be jaded or bummed out about, they find joy in a little trip to KMart and some shopping with a total stranger. They’re all friends with each other, no matter the color or gender or size. They’re appreciative. They’re kind.

Reminds me a lot of what I enjoyed about coaching t-ball years back.

Oh; back to “the holidays.”  My new 8-year old friend’s mom doesn’t celebrate Christmas.  Eh, maybe it’s her religious choice or maybe it’s a financial burden.  Either way, we’ve all lost sight of what the holiday season is supposed to be comprised of.

Ironically, in Washington, politicians are aiming to reduce food stamp benefits (fa la la la la … ) and here we are, as a society, fighting over some crap at Walmart.  More irony?  Those folks working at Walmart – odds are they’re relying on those food stamps because Walmart ain’t about paying living wages to the non-managerial folks.  They say a raise would affect your “everyday low prices,” but the truth is, a $100 trip would cost you an additional $1.10 if their minimum wage was raised to $12.00 across the country.  That’s IF Walmart just didn’t eat the costs without passing it on; or IF Walmart ended their stock buyback practice (which mostly only makes the Walton family more wealthy than they already are – which is more wealthy then the lowest 40% of the country combined).

Where’s the “values” crowd on values we NEED to be better at?  This is the season of Jesus’ birth, and yet, I don’t see a whole lot of “Christian” influence on this country.  I believe this much … if he DOES come back, and sees all this, some of y’all are gonna have some ‘splainin’ to do.

Why Leaving Turner Field Is The Right Move for Braves & Fans

I’ll admit; when I first got the news, I thought “that’s absurd.”  The Atlanta Braves announced Monday that they’d be leaving Turner Field to build a new stadium in nearby Cobb County, and my immediate reaction was “that makes no sense.”

Turner Field, current "home of the Braves"

Turner Field, current “home of the Braves”

Turner Field – home to the Braves since the 1997 season – isn’t old enough a ballpark to become an abandoned relic, I thought. It’s so much of an improvement over the old Fulton County (cookie cutter) Stadium that it’s an incredible waste to let the franchise walk away from a facility with plenty of tread still left on her tires, I said.

But the more I dug into this, and the more I read up, and heck, the more I remembered how I, myself, found plenty to “nitpick” about Turner Field, the more it made sense.  And not just for the Braves and their fans, but for the city of Atlanta and the region, too, honestly.

Let’s face it: the Braves will never build a “Camden Yards.”  I’m not even certain their new stadium will be anything of a “lasting treasure,” honestly; I mean, how “classic” can ANYthing be if it’s built in the corner between two interstate highways, after all?  That’s certainly never going to be confused with “Wrigleyville.”  But my point is, Turner Field wasn’t anything close to a “keeper,” either.

It was built for the 1996 Olympic Games, hastily retrofitted for baseball, and in an area of town that had never developed around its predecessor; an area that didn’t develop around it, either.  It wasn’t some gem wedged into a city block with quirky dimensions necessitated by its confines.  It wasn’t near downtown and lacked any “breathtaking” outfield vista.  It was … just a fairly decent baseball stadium.  Unspectacular, but very adequate.  It was, frankly, too big, came with very little “charm” or interesting dynamics to it, and had started to become over-run with corporate logos and statues that didn’t even bother blending in with the ballpark’s aesthetics – such as they blandly were.

The Braves apparently spent a few years complaining about The Ted’s shortcomings (who knew?) and kept pointing out issues I noticed with the park all along.  Where’s the MARTA light rail stop at the stadium?  Why did anyone think a baseball team not in New York or Los Angeles needed 50,000 seats?  And where’s the “neighborhood ambiance” that was supposed to crop up around the park?

The light rail never came; the cavernous upper deck was never trimmed down (a la U.S. Cellular Field in Chicago) and those parking lots around Turner Field weren’t improving any property values in that area of town.

The Braves' new "neighborhood."

The Braves’ new “neighborhood.”

Whereas at first I alarmingly questioned this move, now I get it.  The Braves and neighboring Cobb County have an arrangement to build a new baseball stadium near the I-75/I-285 interchange, with 60 acres of land around the park for the Braves themselves to develop.  Tens of thousands of pre-and-post-game patrons will now have retail and food & beverage options around the park.  The Braves become an entire neighborhood’s “landlord,” and Cobb County gets some sweet tax revenues.

Where the fans are, the Braves are going

Where the fans are, the Braves are going

In their statement, press release and on their “new stadium website,” the Braves even alluded to mass transit: a veritable MUST for this endeavor to succeed.  While the Braves deftly pointed out, via a red-dotted map, where most of their attendees lived in the north metro, what they truly NEEDED to address was bettering accessibility.  Sure, most metro Atlantans have a car, but most metro Atlantans abhor traffic, too.  And after a hard day’s work, you’d be hard-pressed to find more than five or six thousand families, on a weeknight, who cared to get back in their cars and deal with more gridlock to get to the stadium, pay to park, walk to the stadium, and enjoy the game – especially with high definition television plugged into almost every game, in those families’ living rooms.

So while there’s nothing concrete ABOUT light rail to this new stadium, the Braves having wanted it at The Ted before, and mentioning it in their statements now, tells you they know there’s untapped potential within the Atlanta area for more fans to attend games.

The Braves get to rake in extra revenue from their new, wholly-owned “neighborhood,” just when they need it most, too.  Their television contract, compared to many of the newer TV deals, is pitiful.  In the “arms race,” they were losing ground for salary dollars.  This is a game-changer.

For the city of Atlanta, as mayor Kaseem Reed put it, they’ll be off the hook for a $150 to $200 million improvement bill and get to, instead, pivot towards developing a prime piece of real estate along I-75/85 and I-20.  And with a $900 million backlog of infrastructure improvements, $150-200 million can go a long way.

So now we all wait – with baited breath – to see what KIND of stadium the Braves have designed for them.  We know it’ll be an improvement over Fulton County Stadium and Turner Field, and before anyone get dour at the prospects of there being no booming downtown skyline to see from the park, let me remind you of this: one of the better ballparks in the league right now is Citizens Bank Park, home of the Philadelphia Phillies.  It’s a terrific baseball park, loaded with character and quirks, and it’s nowhere near downtown Philadelphia.

The Braves will definitely not have something like Fenway to call home.

The Braves will definitely not have something like Fenway to call home.

Will we get a Fenway Park?  No, but then who’s gotten one since, anyhow?  Will it be anything like AT&T Park in San Francisco?  No, and mostly because Atlanta lacks such scenic areas to take advantage of.  Can the Braves get a new home more like Citizens Bank Park?  Absolutely.  And if Braves’ fans pack it the way Phillies fans did that gem, the Braves will be major players for the next 10-15 seasons – before a better TV contract is possible.

Debunking the right’s latest Obamacare spin

By Geoffrey Cowley

Geoffre-Cowley-mugshot

Geoffrey Cowley

For a president who has spent five years fighting for health care reform, this should be a blissful moment. Insurance exchanges have opened in all 50 states, more governors are embracing the historic expansion of health care for the poor, and Obamacare’s fiercest congressional opponents have neutered themselves with their government shutdown.

Instead, the administration is slogging through one of the toughest weeks since the Affordable Care Act was signed into law three years ago. Health and Human Services Secretary Kathleen Sebelius faces a congressional interrogation Wednesday for the troubled rollout of the government’s online insurance marketplace. And as the president speaks Wednesday at Boston’s Faneuil Hall, he faces yet another political mess, this one over the cancellation of millions of individual insurance plans that don’t meet the ACA’s minimum standards for coverage.

This latest political storm blew in last weekend, when media outlets started reporting that many people who buy their health coverage directly from insurance companies will have to switch plans in 2014. Their old policies don’t cover the essential health benefits the law requires, so they must now shop for new ones that do. Some people will face higher premiums as a result.

The president has never explained this. He persists in claiming the Affordable Care Act won’t force anyone to switch insurance policies. “If you like your health plan, you will be able to keep your health plan,” he says, ignoring the fact that the health care law could invalidate a quarter of the 14 million individual health policies Americans now hold.

But as critics excoriate the administration for misleading the public, here’s a point to bear in mind. The affected consumers aren’t getting ripped off. Most will get more for care their money under the new system than they ever could have hoped for under the old.

The Affordable Care Act was designed not just to expand insurance coverage but to protect consumers who buy it. Compared to people who get group coverage through their jobs, folks seeking individual health policies have long had a raw deal. Those with pre-existing health conditions have either been denied coverage or charged prohibitive rates, and those deemed insurable have gotten plans with high deductibles and limited coverage. On average, plans sold on the individual market covered just 60% of their subscribers’ medical costs in 2010, researchers reported in Health Affairs last year, while group plans covered 83%. In addition to other fees and copays, the average individual subscriber paid a $2,858 annual deductible—nearly four times the $751 that group plans charged.

To correct these distortions, the health care law requires that products sold as health insurance offer the buyer a minimum level of financial protection. Specifically, the law identifies 10 essential health benefits—ranging from maternity care to lab tests and prescription drugs—that all plans must cover as of January 1, 2014. It also limits the sums that insured people can be charged out-of-pocket for their care. Policies sold before March 23, 2010, are exempt from the law, but most of those have been replaced by newer plans that still fall short of the new benchmarks. Studies suggest that half to three-quarters of current individual plans no longer pass muster. Many individual subscribers have switched from one substandard plan to another during the past three years, so their current ones won’t be grandfathered in.

Hence the frustration. “All we’ve been hearing the last three years is, if you like your policy you can keep it,” LA real estate agent Deborah Cavallaro told the Los Angeles Times. “I’m infuriated because I was lied to.”

Cavallaro received a notice from Anthem Blue Cross this month, saying her cut-rate policy was being canceled because it didn’t meet even the lowest of the four coverage levels that insurers can offer in the new health care exchanges (bronze, silver, gold and platinum). The company said she could get a bronze plan for $484 per month—an increase of about $190. “I just won’t have health insurance because I can’t pay this increase,” she told the paper.

But for every Deborah Cavallaro, there is probably at least one Judith Goss. Goss is a Michigan retail worker who got an inexpensive “mini-med” policy while working at Talbots and kept it going for $65 a month after losing her job. “I was aware that it wasn’t a great plan,” she told Consumer Reports last year, “but I wasn’t concerned because I wasn’t sick.”

When she did get sick—with breast cancer—she quickly surpassed her plan’s four-figure annual spending limits and ended up postponing treatment while she scrounged for $30,000 to cover her bills. As White House spokesman Joshua Earnest says, “Those cheap individual policies seem like a great deal until you actually have to use them.”

Real health insurance would have cost Goss more up front. Thanks to the Affordable Care Act, that kind of coverage is now available—at subsidized rates—through a health care exchange. The law effectively discounts premium prices for people earning up to four times the federal poverty wage ($45,960 for an individual, $94,200 for a family of four). And according to the Kaiser Family Foundation, nearly half of the 14 million Americans now insured through the individual market will qualify for subsidies when they enroll in qualified plans through the exchanges.

A shift of such magnitude was always bound to make waves. The Obama administration could have smoothed them by explaining—early and often—what consumers stand to gain from higher health care standards. The president’s “keep your plan” promises look misinformed or even dishonest now that the revolution is here. But while Obama may suffer politically, consumers are still getting a good deal. Some may pay more for coverage, but they’ll be buying real security.

Geoffrey Cowley is a veteran journalist and advocate who has spent nearly three decades covering health, science and public policy. He joined MSNBC in January 2013 to report on the politics of health. While closely following the national debate over health care reform, he also writes frequently about the health impact of social inequality—from unintended pregnancy to obesity, chronic disease and early death—and the prospects for easing health disparities.